Sir Arthur Eddington: The Scientist & Mystic.

https://youtu.be/HMdHirtIz5o Sir Arthur Eddington was a scientist whom I became aware of some weeks ago when I was researching the history of scientific peer review due to Eric Weinstein's disdain for that process. I came across one of his books, published in 1938, that had one of the words that was used before the term … Continue reading Sir Arthur Eddington: The Scientist & Mystic.

My response to the backlash of “vibe physics,” and getting feedback from ChatGPT.

A hybrid of my thoughts and conversation with AI. Image created with Sora.ai. The latest trend, known as vibe physics, which borrows from the newly coined term vibe coding, is receiving a lot of criticism from experts in the field of physics. Back in March, I said that vibe theorizing would catch on and become the … Continue reading My response to the backlash of “vibe physics,” and getting feedback from ChatGPT.

Discussion with ChatGPT on Eric Weinstein’s Disdain of “Peer Review.”

The Meta-Peer Review Process. Intro The Intellectual Dark Web's poster child and dark lord, Eric Weinstein, is someone whom I follow on X.com. Last week, I watched a recently uploaded video discussion he had with Curt Jaimungal. Jaimungal has a YouTube channel that focuses on the Theory of Everything by inviting various guests, mostly from … Continue reading Discussion with ChatGPT on Eric Weinstein’s Disdain of “Peer Review.”

ChatGPT Peer Reviews Terrence Howard’s latest papers.

https://youtu.be/EYodthAGUx4?si=6mfU1iKmQwgEAH6j Professor Dave Explains Preface. YouTuber and science communicator Professor Dave Explains recently released a video utterly demolishing and debunking Terrence Howard's who went on the PBD Podcast earlier this year. Professor Dave has debunked Howard before, as he has done to others. It reminded me that I had downloaded Howard's papers when I found … Continue reading ChatGPT Peer Reviews Terrence Howard’s latest papers.

Armchair Validity Essay by ChatGPT.

// A persuasive essay as to why ignore the critics who calls someone an armchair scientist. One of the most frustrating and misguided dismissals in intellectual discourse is labeling someone as an "armchair economist" or "armchair scientist," implying their perspectives lack validity because they don't involve direct fieldwork or hands-on experience. This criticism fundamentally misunderstands … Continue reading Armchair Validity Essay by ChatGPT.

The Age of Aquarius For Science and Religion.

Why scientists should be open-minded to pseudo-claims and taboo subjects.Ironically, the Age of Awakening or the Age of Aquarius coincides with talks of the mind-woke virus and identity politics. Maybe it is meant to be that way for every background needs a foreground, and every hero a villain. Nature’s dualistic nature permeated the natural world … Continue reading The Age of Aquarius For Science and Religion.