Author: Social Scholarly

A truth seeker first and foremost. I'm not afraid to plunge down the rabbit hole and I'm curious of everything. Knowledge gives you power, and with that power you must use it wisely. Reading, thinking, and writing is how I exercise my mind. "Keep your heart warm, eyes sharp, brain keen, and mind open."

Why I’m not worried about LLMs long context problem.

Short term pain that will eventually be solved. Someone made this comment on X, “LLMs are still incredibly bad at long context, severe drop in response quality from the best of the best models (o1, Claude, grok, DeepSeek), doesn’t really matter what model — it will choke.” Initially I related because I’ve seen how ChatGPT … Continue reading Why I’m not worried about LLMs long context problem. →

A Metaphysics Where Thoughts Alter Gravity: A Day in the Life of the Air.

AI creative story-telling. Prefix. Inspired by Grok 3 when we discussed the role of meta-physicians. We shared a similar thought: “I see metaphysicians as AI’s mad scientists — less bound by norms, more likely to cook up something truly off-the-wall.” Prompt: “Invent a metaphysics where every thought alters gravity, then narrate a day in that … Continue reading A Metaphysics Where Thoughts Alter Gravity: A Day in the Life of the Air. →

Are Metaphysicians More Effective at Leveraging AI?

I naturally gravitate toward metaphysics rather than physics which relies heavily on mathematical symbols and formalism. Metaphysics is a field of study that aligns more closely with disciplines such as philosophy and logic, both of which are foundational to artificial intelligence and intellectual inquiry in general. While many assume that mathematics is the bedrock of … Continue reading Are Metaphysicians More Effective at Leveraging AI? →

Into the Deep End with ChatGPT about different and novel ways of thinking or reasoning part II.

I was trying to figure out which model of ChatGPT was superior in terms of intelligence to make sure I’m not wasting my time or underutilizing ChatGPT and that’s how the conversation continued. // ChatGPT 4o Me: Rate all these models 1-5 stars and reasons why and best use cases: GPT 4o, o1, o3-mini, o3-mini-high, … Continue reading Into the Deep End with ChatGPT about different and novel ways of thinking or reasoning part II. →

Into the Deep End with ChatGPT about different and novel ways of thinking or reasoning part I.

I believe I was trying to find which model of ChatGPT was superior in terms of intelligence to make sure I'm not wasting my time or underutilizing ChatGPT and that's how the conversation began. // ChatGPT o3-mini-high Me: Do you think it is best for LLMs to consider reasoning at a much slower pace, and … Continue reading Into the Deep End with ChatGPT about different and novel ways of thinking or reasoning part I. →

How AGI could emerge? A discussion w/ ChatGPT.

Me: Please provide your feedback and thoughts on this post. Postulate neglected or overlooked camps or ideas not mentioned. ChatGPT: This post outlines three prevailing views on the emergence of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) from Large Language Models (LLMs), but there are additional perspectives worth considering. Let’s explore these in depth. Breakdown of the Three … Continue reading How AGI could emerge? A discussion w/ ChatGPT. →

Towards a Unified Framework of Quantum Gravity: Exploring Self-Referential, Holographic, and Fractal Models of Reality By Polydialectic Aether.

Abstract: The reconciliation of General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics remains one of the most profound open problems in theoretical physics. Conventional approaches such as String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and Holography have made significant progress but remain incomplete. This paper presents three alternative hypotheses: (1) The Quantum Interwoven Hologram (QIH), which proposes that spacetime is … Continue reading Towards a Unified Framework of Quantum Gravity: Exploring Self-Referential, Holographic, and Fractal Models of Reality By Polydialectic Aether. →

ChatGPT’s sociological insights on sex-work, OnlyFans, and homelessness.

Me: Can you provide psychological and sociological research insights into why women do porn and sex work? ChatGPT: Alright, let’s break this down systematically. The question asks why women engage in pornography and sex work. This is a vast, multi-layered issue with psychological, sociological, economic, and cultural dimensions. Any attempt to answer it comprehensively requires … Continue reading ChatGPT’s sociological insights on sex-work, OnlyFans, and homelessness. →